<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Eches - Blogging, technology, internet and earn money online &#187; Hosting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.eches.net/category/hosting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.eches.net</link>
	<description>Tips &#38; Tricks related to web, internet and computer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 23:51:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Host Monster: Affordable and Reliable Hosting</title>
		<link>http://blog.eches.net/reviews/host-monster-affordable-and-reliable-hosting/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.eches.net/reviews/host-monster-affordable-and-reliable-hosting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 12:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eches</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eches.net/?p=2346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For me, hosting multiple sites and depending entirely on a hosting provider is not really a convenient option. I prefer to spread dozen of my sites to several web hosting providers. The idea is to make sure that not all &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me, hosting multiple sites and depending entirely on a hosting provider is not really a convenient option. I prefer to spread dozen of my sites to several web hosting providers. The idea is to make sure that not all my sites are affected when something goes <strong><a href="http://www.webhostingtalk.com/archive/index.php/t-634037.html">wrong</a></strong> with a particular hosting provider and that explains why I keep on <strong><a href="http://blog.eches.net/category/hosting/">subscribing</a></strong> on new hostings from time to time. </p>
<p><img src="http://blog.eches.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/hostmonster.jpg" alt="" align="left" hspace="5" /><br />
Hostmonster has been operating since 1996 and is one of the oldest web hosting provider with an excellent feedback. For what is worth, <strong><a href="http://www.hostmonster.com/">Host Monster</a></strong> and <strong><a href="http://www.bluehost.com/">Blue Host</a></strong> are owned by the same company. Both offer almost the same support, configuration and price as well. They own and operate their own data center with top end servers and excellent infrastructure.</p>
<p>HostMonster has a LOT of features to offer at cheap price. Consider these; <strong>UNLIMITED DOMAINS</strong>, Cpanel with Fantastico, Domain Name, Shell Access(SSH), Custom PHP.INI Files, 100MySQL Databases and the list goes on. Frankly, this is more than what any advanced user will ask for. </p>
<p>One thing that I really love about Hostmonster is because users are allowed to control almost everything related to their domains all by themselves.</p>
<p><img src="http://blog.eches.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/hostmonster-domain.jpg" alt="" /> </p>
<p>So if, at one point, you decide to extend your expiration date or you want to add privacy protection to a particular domain, you can always do that via the domain manager inside the control panel. Unlike some other hostings, you may need to open ticket and wait for their staffs to do it on your behalf.</p>
<p><img src="http://blog.eches.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/hostmonster-domain1.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>In term of performance, HostMonster claims to host all their hosting accounts on latest Quad Opteron Servers, backed with backup UPS and generators with all servers are put on 24/7 monitoring. Hostmonster also offer OC-48 backbone connection for all the servers. Personally, I'm extremely happy with the overall performance of HostMonster and after almost a year with it, I never experience any down time on 6 domains (not that I'm aware of).</p>
<p>Get more details about Hostmonster over at <strong><a href="http://www.webhostingchoice.com/review/host-monster/">host monster review</a></strong>.</p>
<p><b>Technorati Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/HostMonster" rel="tag">HostMonster</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/web+hosting" rel="tag"> web hosting</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/hosting+provider" rel="tag"> hosting provider</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/review" rel="tag"> review</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/" rel="tag"> </a></b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.eches.net/reviews/host-monster-affordable-and-reliable-hosting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eches.net on New Virtual Private Server (VPS)</title>
		<link>http://blog.eches.net/hosting/echesnet-on-new-virtual-private-server-vps/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.eches.net/hosting/echesnet-on-new-virtual-private-server-vps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eches</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hosting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eches.net/?p=1460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eches.net finally moved on to new VPS over at Knownhost, that was after 1 month and a half residing in $99/month VPS in Siteground. There are few more hostings in my list that offer competitive price (I mentioned previously in &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://blog.eches.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/knownhost.jpg" alt="" align="left" />Eches.net finally moved on to new VPS over at <strong><a href="http://knownhost.com">Knownhost</a></strong>, that was after 1 month and a half residing in $99/month VPS in Siteground. There are few more hostings in my list that offer competitive price (I mentioned previously in this <strong><a href="http://blog.eches.net/hosting/echesnet-suspended-for-causing-cpu-overload/">post</a></strong>), but Knownhost seems to offer the best support (that's what I care the most) and not to mention the performance. </p>
<p>I thought the domain transfer would bring down this blog momentarily but it wasn't; all files and databases were backed up and transferred smoothly and quickly. Please bear in mind, the transfer is not fully propagated as just yet, so you might notice some hiccups when you browse this blog.</p>
<p>With this new hosting I only need to pay $30 for 400 GB bandwidth, 10 GB space, 256 MB (min), 768 MB (Burst) with 2 dedicated IP and on top of that an extra of $5 for cPanel/WHM; roughly one third of what I pay in Siteground. There are lot of things that I need to explore inside the WebHost Manager (WHM) and I'm pretty excited with this new stuff. The FTP access is quick (compared with Siteground), the loading is fast, the support is superb, so I hope eches.net will reside in Knowhost for quite some time. </p>
<p>On the other note, lately this blog lacks of post because I'm at the middle of something and this new hosting transfer only adds up to the procrastination. But don't worry it will be back on track very soon. </p>
<p><b>Technorati Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/knownhost" rel="tag">knownhost</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/siteground" rel="tag"> siteground</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/VPS" rel="tag"> VPS</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/new+hosting" rel="tag"> new hosting</a></b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.eches.net/hosting/echesnet-on-new-virtual-private-server-vps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WebHostingRating: Choosing the right Web Hosting</title>
		<link>http://blog.eches.net/reviews/webhostingrating-web-hosting-rating/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.eches.net/reviews/webhostingrating-web-hosting-rating/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 00:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eches</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eches.net/?p=1005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When people start considering a hosting for their domains, review from other webmasters is an essential piece of information that need to be collected before making up decisive decision on what hosting they are going to dwell on. Forums like &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When people start considering a hosting for their domains, review from other webmasters is an essential piece of information that need to be collected before making up decisive decision on what hosting they are going to dwell on. Forums like DigitalPoint and web hosting rating sites are two sources of extreme importance when it comes to assessing the real performance of a hosting. As we speak, there are always new rating sites jump on the bandwagon to serve the purpose.</p>
<p>But what really dictates a good web hosting rating site? When we talk about a good rating site, generally it comes down to the fundamental aspect of this industry; independent customer review. If this important element is in presence, you are indeed hanging out at the right place before settling down with your new hosting. </p>
<p><img src="http://blog.eches.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/webhostingrating.jpg" alt="" hspace="5" vspace="5" /></p>
<p>If you are looking for a web hosting, try to pay a visit on WebHostingRating.com, a web hosting directory that starts taking shape in providing reliable independent reviews. As we already see in other websites alike, WebHostingRating offers independent review from web hosting existing customers and at the same time provide additional information to further help potential customer in making decisive decision. </p>
<p>Basically, the top-ten-rating <strong><a href="http://webhostingrating.com/awards/">web hosting awards</a></strong> system implemented in WebHostingRating is categorized according to Unix Hosting, Windows Hosting, Reseller Hosting, VPS Hosting, Dedicated Hosting, Collocation Hosting and Managed Hosting. The assessment is based on customer satisfaction, affordability, reliability, up-time and technical support.</p>
<p>One important element in running a successful <strong><a href="http://webhostingrating.com">web hosting rating</a></strong> site is the existence of <strong><a href="http://webhostingrating.com/articles/">web hosting tutorials</a></strong> aiming at potential customer ranging from novice to expert. The articles are primarily aim to new webmaster who might not well versed with several jargons used in hosting specifications. This will definitely give them a better insight of what hosting they really look for. These articles of course are not limited to newbies as some articles provides tips like choosing a domain, cheap hosting vs expensive hosting and many more.</p>
<p>When I first visited this site couple of weeks ago, obviously WebHostingRating site is relatively new in the industry (judging from broken links that appear on several links). Having said that, this site rapidly progresses as many empty spaces had been filled and gaining more reviews as I'm writing this post.</p>
<p>WebHostingRating is really a good start if you are currently thinking of getting a hosting. Cross check with other sites and forums, you will eventually find a hosting that is able to cater you need at the affordable price. </p>
<p>And hey, if you are currently subscribed to a hosting, you may want to share your experience with the hosting company with the whole world. Sign up and get your review up on WebHostingRating. </p>
<p><b>Technorati Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/review" rel="tag">review</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/WebHostingRating" rel="tag"> WebHostingRating</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/web+hosting+rating" rel="tag"> web hosting rating</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/VPS" rel="tag"> VPS</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/dedicated+server" rel="tag"> dedicated server</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/shared+hosting" rel="tag"> shared hosting</a></b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.eches.net/reviews/webhostingrating-web-hosting-rating/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eches.net suspended for causing CPU overload</title>
		<link>http://blog.eches.net/hosting/echesnet-suspended-for-causing-cpu-overload/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.eches.net/hosting/echesnet-suspended-for-causing-cpu-overload/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 12:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eches</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hosting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eches.net/?p=980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eches.net was not accessible for almost 24 hours yesterday as the number of unique visitors gradually increases and keep hitting the maximum CPU usage for a shared hosting. I was kindly reminded by Siteground a week ago regarding the alarming &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://blog.eches.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/vps.gif" alt="" hspace="5" vspace="5" align="left" /><a href="http://blog.eches.net"><strong>Eches.net</strong></a> was not accessible for almost 24 hours yesterday as the number of unique visitors gradually increases and keep hitting the maximum CPU usage for a shared hosting. I was kindly reminded by <strong><a href="http://blog.eches.net/internet/siteground-hosting-renewal/">Siteground</a></strong> a week ago regarding the alarming traffic development in this site and the need to switch to VPS or dedicated server to better accommodate the growing traffic, but I managed to bring this blog into a safe zone by implementing super cache plugin and by removing most of subdomains that brought a handful of visitors.</p>
<p>Yesterday, eches.net was again hit by consistent surge of traffics. While happy looking at the positive development indicated by Google analytics, I was shocked to see a steep slope of yesterday's traffic. Email from Siteground confirmed that eches.net was suspended for hitting the capped level again and causing poor performance to other Siteground's client hostings.</p>
<p>I tried to do a quick transfer to a VPS provider (<strong><a href="http://knownhost.com">Knownhost</a></strong>) but I ended up running in the same circle again and again (failed to propagate the name servers etc). I must say VPS is totally a new environment and there are lot of things to be learned. Taking the situation into consideration, I guess it must take at least 2 days to get everything properly setup. 2 days of down time carry too much stakes. The simplest way to get around the problem is by purchasing VPS from Siteground but it costs me a whopping $99 a month!</p>
<p>Eches.net definitely won't dwell long enough in this VPS since there are other cheaper VPSs but provide superb performance. I probably try <a href="http://slicehost.com"><strong>Slicehost</strong></a>; it's affordable. Starting with $38/month you can have the same specifications as what I have now.</p>
<p>Frankly, I believe there are several companies that are specialized in VPS and <a href="http://www.webhostingsearch.com/dedicated-server.php"><strong>dedicated server host</strong></a> and that explains why I start to revisit several hosting review sites that I used to visit long time ago. If you plan to own your first domain, VPS is not for you yet; look no further than to find<a href="http://www.webhostingsearch.com/cheap-web-hosting.php"><strong> cheap web host</strong></a> (shared hosting).</p>
<p>I will keep you posted with my new quest on finding suitable VPS for my blog. Don't forget to subscribe my <strong><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/EchesBlog">feed</a></strong>.</p>
<p><b>Technorati Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/VPS" rel="tag">VPS</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/shared+hosting" rel="tag"> shared hosting</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Siteground" rel="tag"> Siteground</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Slicehost" rel="tag"> Slicehost</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Knownhost" rel="tag"> Knownhost</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/dedicated+server" rel="tag"> dedicated server</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/CPU+overload" rel="tag"> CPU overload</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/super+cache+plugin" rel="tag"> super cache plugin</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/cheap+VPS" rel="tag"> cheap VPS</a></b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.eches.net/hosting/echesnet-suspended-for-causing-cpu-overload/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Looking for best hosting? Here&#8217;s the head start</title>
		<link>http://blog.eches.net/reviews/looking-for-best-hosting-heres-the-head-start/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.eches.net/reviews/looking-for-best-hosting-heres-the-head-start/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 17:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eches</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eches.net/?p=444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Choosing the right hosting to cater your websites and future expansion is not really an easy task. If you have been long enough in developing websites you will quickly realize that some hosting sites oversell and provide services that are &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Choosing the right hosting to cater your websites and future expansion is not really an easy task. If you have been long enough in developing websites you will quickly realize that some hosting sites oversell and provide services that are beyond their capacity. To make thing worse, some review sites provide overrated appraisals on hosting companies. This explains why people easily drown in the abundance of hyped reviews and finally make the wrong choice. </p>
<p>There are few credible hosting review sites that I visited recently before I made up my mind to buy a hosting package at Hostgator. <a href="http://webhostinggeeks.com/ "><strong>Web Hosting Geeks</strong></a> is one of them.<br />
<img src="http://blog.eches.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/webgeekhosting.png" alt="" /><br />
Judging from its look, it has a simple yet vibrant logo at the top, giving visitors a good impression on its credibility. Yup, I agree. Design is not the concern of many people as we seek for a good hosting. Bear in mind though, great overall design usually reflects on the quality of a particular website. </p>
<p>As we get down to the page structure, obviously, the navigation is categorized systematically according to budget, nature of website (forum, mini site, blog etc), rating, award, server platform and many more. Well defined categories will definitely helps users in making apple-to-apple comparison and hence better decision making. </p>
<p>Apart from that, there are 3 primary qualities that make Web Hosting Geeks stands out above the rest.</p>
<p><strong>Independent Reviews submitted by Hosting Customers</strong> – People can sure read the brochure from hosting websites about all the ‘good’ things related to their services but do they really live to the expectation? The best way to judge the real performance and quality of a hosting is by referring to reviews and ratings cast away by their existing customers.</p>
<p>As more <strong><a href="http://webhostinggeeks.com/user-reviews/">web hosting reviews</a></strong> and ratings could be gathered, it effectively builds up into an independent pool and reliable source of reading for potential customers. </p>
<p><center><img src="http://blog.eches.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/webgeekhosting-1.png" alt="" /></center></p>
<p><strong>Up-to-date Uptime Monitoring</strong> – This is a unique feature that can hugely assist bloggers and webmasters in choosing hosting company for their websites. Frequent downtime might be a major turn off to your visitors and it also reflects how bad a company is in providing guaranteed uptime.       </p>
<p><img src="http://blog.eches.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/webgeekhosting-3.png" alt="" /></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://webhostinggeeks.com/articles/">Quality</a></strong> <strong><a href="http://webhostinggeeks.com/articles/">web hosting articles</a></strong> - Here’s the best part of this site. While advanced webmasters can easily decide of what they want for their websites, this is not necessarily the case for newbies. Going through the articles will definitely give a better insight of what are you dealing with and it will effectively guide you into making sound decision. </p>
<p><strong>Final Words</strong><br />
This <strong><a href="http://webhostinggeeks.com">web hosting</a></strong> <strong><a href="http://webhostinggeeks.com">review site</a></strong> serve good comparison and guidelines to you in deciding which hosting company to go for. Before making your final move, it's advisable to go through more similar sites to see more options as you might find better deal for your websites.</p>
<p><b>Technorati Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/review" rel="tag">review</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/hosting+review" rel="tag"> hosting review</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/hosting+plan" rel="tag"> hosting plan</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/hostgator" rel="tag"> hostgator</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/siteground" rel="tag"> siteground</a></b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.eches.net/reviews/looking-for-best-hosting-heres-the-head-start/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Siteground: Hosting renewal</title>
		<link>http://blog.eches.net/internet/siteground-hosting-renewal/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.eches.net/internet/siteground-hosting-renewal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 12:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eches</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eches.net/2007/01/26/siteground-hosting-renewal/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just finished renewing my hosting for eches.net domain for another 1 year. It's been 2 years now and I still remembered from my vague memory, how dubious I was at the moment when I was about to decide whether &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.siteground.com/atrack.php?referrerid=22063"><img src="http://blog.eches.net/images/0107/siteground.jpg" border="0" alt="Siteground: recommended hosting" align="left" /></a>I just finished renewing my hosting for eches.net domain for another 1 year. It's been 2 years now and I still remembered from my vague memory, how dubious I was at the moment when I was about to decide whether or not to switch to this hosting. If my memory didn't betray me, Siteground was hardly seen in any <a href="http://www.webhostingsearch.com"><strong>top ten hostings</strong></a>.</p>
<p>What I like the most about Siteground is its customer service support. After 2 years I had issued 17 tickets regarding several issues ranging from domain transfer to technical stuffs and they never failed to deliver responses in a timely manner (7 minutes on average). In one special issue, my domain was used to be suspended because of spamming, originated from a forum that's setup but not properly maintained. Luckily the problem was solved within 24 hours and in a very professional way.</p>
<p>Fantastico, is a feature in Siteground that can be proud of. You can install most of well-established CMS and PHP scripts on the fly with just few clicks. Yeah, I agree, it's better to setup the scripts manually since it can give you a better insight of goings on in the scripts and it comes handy when you need to fix a problem should they occur but fantastico will give you the flavour of operating, say, a CMS (Joomla). From the point onwards you can treasure youself on how to setup the script manually on your own.</p>
<p><span id="more-183"></span></p>
<p>The space and bandwidth? For me, it's more than enough. 40 GB of space and 900 GB of bandwidth are so enormous that I can barely scratch the small fraction of those capacities. With all the features and if you are serious about bringing massive traffic into your website, I would recommend you this hosting. Please bear in mind, if you are going to have few domains reside in the same hosting, this might not be a good place as the addition of 1 addon slot itself will cost you $30 a year and on top of that you need to pay extra few bucks for the extra domain.</p>
<p><b>Technorati Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/siteground" rel="tag">siteground</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/recommended+hosting" rel="tag">recommended hosting</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/review" rel="tag">review</a></b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.eches.net/internet/siteground-hosting-renewal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My hosting renewal and domains</title>
		<link>http://blog.eches.net/internet/my-hosting-renewal-and-domains/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.eches.net/internet/my-hosting-renewal-and-domains/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 06:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eches</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My 24/7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eches.net/2007/01/15/my-hosting-renewal-and-domains/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My hosting account with Siteground is almost 2 years old and now requires renewal. I got 2 domains reside in that hosting but it's pretty expensive since I need to pay $30 for 1 additional addon slot and on top &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My hosting account with Siteground is almost 2 years old and now requires renewal. I got 2 domains reside in that hosting but it's pretty expensive since I need to pay $30 for 1 additional addon slot and on top of that I need to pay few more bucks for the additional domain. If you are planning of having multiple domains I would suggest GoDaddy as I currently have another 2  domains in GoDaddy. Still, I believe there's some hostings that might offer better price but they never yet come into my sight.  </p>
<p>For what it's worth, I'm lurking on few forums such as <a href="http://forums.digitalpoint.com/">DigitalPoints</a> and <a href="http://www.dnforum.com">Dnforum</a> where discusssion about domain, IDN domains and few other jargons I never come across before take place. If you looking for things related to SEO, buying one way backlink, Adsense, affiliates and things related to optimising your websites, <a href="http://forums.digitalpoint.com">DigitalPoints</a> is the best place to be.  </p>
<p><span id="more-171"></span><br />
If you looking for infos related to <a href="http://www.dnforum.com" rel="nofollow">domain name registration</a>, <a href="http://www.dnforum.com" rel="nofollow">trademark law</a>, <a href="http://www.dnforum.com" rel="nofollow">trademark registration</a> and thing related to domain, <a href="http://www.dnforum.com" rel="nofollow">DNforum</a> seems to be the best spot to gain extra knowledge from. </p>
<p>Do you have any suggestion of cheap domain hostings whereabouts? </p>
<p><b>Technorati Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/domain" rel="tag">domain</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/trademark" rel="tag">trademark</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/digitalpoint" rel="tag">digitalpoint</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/dnforum" rel="tag">dnforum</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/hosting" rel="tag">hosting</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/siteground" rel="tag">siteground</a></b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.eches.net/internet/my-hosting-renewal-and-domains/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
